The Clogger Guide to Global Chainsaw Protection Standards

There is a lot of confusion about the chainsaw protection standards and how they vary around the world.

Type C, Class 1, chainsaw fabric layers, chainspeed, test methods ….

Understanding the global chainsaw protection standards is becoming increasingly important as arborists explore work opportunities in different countries and as arborist retailers start shipping outside their home country.

We thought that it was time to put a comprehensive guide to chainsaw protection standards together.

1. The Two Main Global Chainsaw Protection Standards

Broadly speaking there are 2 global standards.

• European EN381

• North American ASTM F1897

The Australian/New Zealand standard is almost a direct copy of the EN381, so for the purposes of this paper it will be grouped under that document. The small differences are outlined later.

The Canadian standards are related to F1897 and will be discussed as a subset of that standard.

---

---

a. The European standard EN381

This standard has several parts to it covering footwear, legwear, hand and upper body protective garments.

Part 1 outlines the construction of the test rig for performing chainsaw cut tests.

Part 2 outlines the test methods to be performed on leg protectors.

Part 5 gives the requirements for leg protectors, i.e. the coverage areas, general construction details, the performance testing needed and the labeling and marking information required.

Note

EN 351 has been superceded by EN ISO 11393 effective 19 November 2021. The main change is the replacement of Design B with a new chap design. Chainsaw chaps were not previously included in the standard. Garments certified to EN 381 are still able to be used up to the expiry of their certificate (5 years after the certification date). We will be making additional updates to this post to reflect this and other changes introduced by EN ISO 11393.

The differences between EN381.5 and the Australian/New Zealand standard, AS/NZS4453.3

1. EN381.5 only allows for trouser type garments incl. leggings, not chaps that buckle at the rear of the leg, whereas AS/NZS4453.3 allows for both types.
2. EN381.5 includes 3 different classes of chainspeed testing; Class 1 at 20 m/s, Class 2 at 24 m/s and Class 3 at 28 m/s. AS/NZS4453.3 only has one level of chainspeed testing which is 20 m/s.
3. EN381.5 outlines the coverage areas for three different designs of trousers, Design A, Design B and Design C, whereas AS/NZS4453.3 has adopted Design A only with one very minor modification. These designs will be looked at closely later.

b. The North American standard ASTM F1897 – 14

This standard outlines the requirements for leg protection, i.e. general requirements for design and how they are made, the protective coverage areas, the performance testing needed, the certification process, the care and maintenance guidelines and the labeling and marking information required.

The test methods for testing to this standard are given in ASTM F1414 – 13.

c. Comparison of the requirements and the test methods for both of these standards.

The requirements and the test methods employed by both standards are given in the table below. While these differences may appear insignificant, the two standards produce completely different results and the meaning of the results are not comparable, consequently there is no direct correlation between them.

i. Requirements

	EN381	ASTM F1897 & F1414
Various tests required	Dimensional change (shrinkage), chainsaw cut testing, protective area checking, attachment strength of chainsaw pad to garment	Chainsaw cut testing
Preconditioning of test samples	5 times specified washing and drying procedure	5 times specified washing and drying procedure
Requirements for dimensional change	Less than 6% for both length and width	No requirement
Requirements for protective area	Trousers Design A: covers from 20 cm above crotch to 5 cm above hem with an extra 5 cm of protection wrapping around on the left side of each leg. Trousers Design B: as for Design A but with an extra 5 cm wrapping around 5 cm to the right of the left leg Trousers Design C: Front protection from 20 cm above the crutch to 5 cm above the hem with rear protection from 5 cm below the crutch to 5 cm above the hem.	Pants/Trousers: a minimum length covering from the crutch to 7.5 cm (3”) above the hem with an extra 0.524 rad (30°) or 100 mm (4”) wrapping around to the left of each leg. (Note that 30° equates to approx 6 cm at the top of the thigh.) Chaps: a minimum length of 700 mm (28”) covering from the crutch to 25 mm (1”) above the carrier garment. Minimum width of 350 mm (14”) at the midpoint of the pad and 250mm (10”) at the bottom of the pad.
Requirements for pad attachment strength	200N force	No requirement

ii. Testing Methods

	EN381	ASTM F1897 & F1414
Drive unit for test rig	Electrically powered motor with a clutch and flywheel of specified inertia	Standard gasoline powered chainsaw with standard clutch mechanism.
Performed on	Actual garments	Rectangular pads made up in the materials intended to be used. Calibration pads are specified as 200mm x 700mm however actual test pads are accepted in varying dimensions.
Number of tests	6 cuts, 3 on each leg for Design A, and 2 cuts on each leg on both front and rear for Design C.	As many as are required to determine the threshold chainspeed, usually 24.
Angle and position of cut tests	All cuts after preconditioning, 45° in the knee area with the chain moving upwards from left to right of the leg.	In the centre of the test pads. Usually, those performed are: 6 cuts without preconditioning at 45°, 6 cuts without preconditioning at 90°, 6 cuts after preconditioning at 45°, and 6 cuts after preconditioning at 90°.
Status of power at point of release	Power released	Power remains on
Height above pad at point of release	3mm	50mm (2”)
Distance from point of contact to centre of drive sprocket	130mm	130mm
Downward force at point of contact	15N	15N
Chain type	8mm, 0.325” pitch	10mm, 0.375” pitch
Drive sprocket	7 tooth	7 tooth
Method of fixing of test specimen	A row of spikes 30mm apart penetrate the specimen for a length of 800mm on the opposite side of the specimen from the drive unit. The spikes are omitted for a distance of 60 mm each side of the contact point. Masses of 250g every 100mm are used to hold specimen in place over the specimen holder.	2 plates 75 mm x 25 mm with centrelines 290 mm apart are clamped up tight on to specimen. Clamps are on the opposite side of specimen from drive unit. No mass is used to pull pad taut over the specimen holder.
	20 m/s or 24 m/s or 28 m/s	2750 ft/min
Reporting method	Pass or fail at the specified chainspeed. Cut-through is deemed to be if there is a cut of greater than 10mm in the lining material.	There are two reporting methods. The first method is to evaluate a simple pass/failure at a specified chain speed e.g. 2750 ft/min. All 24 pads tested must show no cut- through at this chain speed. The second determines a threshold chain speed or CS50 which is the speed at which the probability of cut- through is 50%. Cut-through is deemed to be any cut in the lining fabric.

Comparing Test Methods

• The European standard reports the results of cut-testing simply as a pass/fail to a minimum level of chainspeed, therefore no indication is given of the margin of safety that exists of a particular garment above that minimum level.  The CS50 determination as reported under F1897 does give a direct comparison of the performance of different garments which is useful.  Bear in mind that this CS50 determination is an additional test procedure that must be requested from Underwriters Laboratory (UL) and does not constitute part of the certification process.  Certification of a garment by UL means that the garment is certified to pass at the minimum level as specified in the standard.
• The main differences between the two standards, power status, height above test specimen, fixing methods, size of chain and angle of cuts, all mean that there is no correlation between the two.  Simply converting m/s to ft/min mathematically to compare performance should not be contemplated.
• The European standard cut testing is performed on an actual garment, although the garment is prevented from rotating on the specimen holder by means of the spikes.  The ASTM standard cut tests are performed on test pads which are only representative of the final product.
• It is noted that there are no tests performed to determine how well the protective pad is held in place in the carrier garment with the ASTM F1897 standard.

The Canadian standard ASTM F3325 – 20

ASTM F3325-20 is the current certification standard for Canada. The previous standard, ASTM F3325-19 (formally issued 1st Feb 2019) superseded BNQ 1923.

December 31st, 2020 was the date that all manufacturers needed to produce garments that were certified to ASTM F3325-19 and no longer could produce garments certified to BNQ 1923.

After this date, resellers and distributors will still be able to sell product certified to BNQ 1923 provided it was manufactured prior to Dec 31st 2020.

End-users will still be able to wear garments certified to BNQ 1923. The implementation of a new standard doesn’t render an existing product unsafe or unacceptable that was produced under a current standard as at the time of manufacture.

All garments produced after 31 Dec 2020 should have the wording, ASTM F3325, displayed on a label visible on the outside of the garment.

The change to ASTM F3325 establishes a much-needed alignment between the Canadian and USA standards. They now share the same test methods, certification processes, marking and labelling requirements. This will make it easier going forward for companies who carry out work each side of the border as the same garment will more likely be able to be certified to both standards.

The differences between the new standard, ASTM F3325 and the original Canadian standard, BNQ 1923 are not of any major significance therefore in most cases there will be no noticeable changes to the products themselves apart from wording on the labels. Table 1 sets out the key features of the standards and what changes have been incorporated into ASTM F3325.

Comparison of the requirements and the test methods for both updated and former Canadian standards:

	ASTM F3325 (Current)	BNQ 1923 (Withdrawn)
Certification	Includes a clause mandating that garments that comply with this standard must be certified by a 3rd party certification organisation.	No mandatory provision for certification although UL has been certifying product to this standard up to the current time.
Vertical coverage area – pants	At front: from crutch level to 7.5cm above the hem. At rear: 30.5cm from below knee to 7.5cm above hem	At front: from crutch level to 7.5cm above the hem. At rear: from below knee to 7.5cm above hem, (no minimum length given)
Options for horizontal coverage area – pants	4 category options: A: 180° at front as per vertical coverage above and 180° of calf area as above B: as for ‘A’ but with no rear protection. C: 180° at front as per the vertical coverage area above plus an extra 30° or 10cm to the left of each leg D: as for ‘C’, but with calf protection as detailed in the vertical coverage area.	3 category options: A: 180° at front as per vertical coverage above and 180° of calf area as above B: as for ‘A’ but with no rear protection. C: 180° at front as per the vertical coverage area above plus an extra 10cm to the left of each leg
Vertical coverage area – chaps	At front: minimum overall length of 68.5cm At rear: minimum overall length of 30.5cm.	At front: from crutch level to 7.5cm above the hem. At rear: from below knee to 7.5cm above hem, (no minimum length given)
Options for horizontal coverage area – chaps	4 category options: A, B, C and D designed to emulate the coverage areas for pants with specific measurements given for width at certain points.	3 category options: A, B and C designed to cover the same area as for pants. No specific measurements given.
Fastenings for chaps	States that straps must be permanently attached. Certain placement positions given.	States that garments must have a means to hold the protective pad in place. Doesn’t specify ‘permanent’ and doesn’t specify placement positions.
Chainspeed for cut testing	3000 ft/min	3000 ft/min
Labelling	Label(s) on the outside that identifies the manufacturer and the certification organisation as well as the standard that it complies with, ASTM F3325. Characters must be 3mm high on a white background. Other information can be included on a label on the inside of the garment.	Label on the outside that states the name of the manufacturer, the category for coverage area, the standard number, BNQ 1923, the care instructions, the garment size and the leg length.
Instructions for use	To be supplied on a separate document that can be retained for the future covering care, washing, maintenance, repair and warnings.	No additional information required.

Note on British Columbia

The Canadian standard, Worksafe BC Schedule 8-A, section 8.21 is adapted from the original WCB (Workers Compensation Board) standard PPE 1 – 1997.

At that time there was a test rig commissioned to test to this standard based in BC, which was similar to the test rig described in F1414, but with one notable difference, namely the specimen holder was free to rotate around its axis. This meant that the chain engaged with fresh protective fabric as it rotated when under test, whereas with F1414 the chain digs deeper into the same place as it is not free to rotate. This test rig was decommissioned some years ago when the owner/operator died and the rig was sold to a legwear manufacturer. It is no longer available for public use.

This Worksafe BC standard is similar to ASTM F3325, however it only allows for one design of garment which is the equivalent of Category C.

Unusually, it allows for four different ways of complying with the cut test requirements:

(i) Achieving a threshold chainspeed of 3600 ft/min when tested using the test rig for WCB PPE 1 – 1997 (ii) Achieving a threshold chainspeed of 3300 ft/min when tested according to ASTM F1414 (iii) Meeting EN381-5 at the chainspeed level of 24 m/s (iv) Meeting ISO 11393-2 (same as EN381-5) at the chainspeed level of 24 m/s.

It is to be noted that chainsaw operators and companies generally refer to the minimum chainspeed needed to comply as 3600 ft/min. What is not understood is that this speed has reference to a test method that is no longer available.

The applicable test speed for British Columbia is 3300 ft/min when tested according to F1414.

Conclusion

In summary, there are very significant differences between chainsaw protections standards globally and the results obtained using one test method cannot be translated over to the other. 

Both test methods are designed to create a benchmark test by which to compare different manufacturer’s product and this they do.  While neither are perfect, both standards are designed to outline the minimum requirements of leg protectors with the object of protecting chainsaw users from horrific accidents.